Who are Lacewing Media?
We are a London based marketing agency working with international clients at the top of their game.
Great marketing is essential as part of a successful business model.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years, revolutionising various sectors and fundamentally altering how we live and interact with technology. However, as AI systems become increasingly prevalent in decision-making processes, it is crucial to acknowledge the presence of human bias that can infiltrate these systems, leading to adverse consequences. The infusion of human biases into AI poses significant ethical concerns, exacerbates social disparities, and undermines the fairness and objectivity of AI-powered algorithms.
Automated bias in AI refers to the unintended and often discriminatory outcomes produced by artificial intelligence systems due to inherent human biases within the algorithms and data used to train them. While AI systems are designed to make decisions based on data and patterns, they can inadvertently amplify and perpetuate biases in the training data or the algorithmic design. These automated biases pose ethical and practical risks that must be addressed to ensure fair and just AI applications. At its worst human bias within a globally used AI can have adverse societal effects and ethical concerns, such as the distribution of false information, intensification of discrimination, and infringement of consumer rights. Bias can arise from various sources, including biased data collection and use, biased algorithms, and human decision-making biases. Biased AI systems erode the trust and transparency necessary for public acceptance and confidence in AI technology. Moreover, if individuals perceive AI systems as inherently biased or unfair and thus untrustworthy, it can hinder their adoption and create resistance to implementation across various sectors, arguably hindering global technological progress.
Examples of the danger of bias in AI systems include racial and gender bias, which can arise from the lack of gender and social diversity in both data sets the AI is developed on and the lack of diversity within the AI development team. Additionally, the haste from AI managers to deliver much-anticipated results can also have a role to play, as there is a smaller window of time for the AI to be trained on a broader, more inclusive and diverse data set.
Two instances of bias risk are hiring algorithms and automated decision-making systems (ADM). Many companies have now integrated hiring algorithms into their candidate screening process due to the sheer volume of applicants. However, if either of these algorithms were trained on biased data, this would result in specific demographics continuing to be systematically favoured while marginalising others, perpetuating and amplifying existing inequalities and harmful stereotypes, continuing discriminatory behaviour, reinforcing dangerous social biases, and raising many ethical issues.
To address the risks associated with AI bias, it is crucial for any business that plans to use AI to acknowledge and be aware of these existing problems and dangers. Developing ethical principles and requirements prioritising fairness and inclusivity is essential, and Artificial Intelligence developers should actively aim to mitigate these risks. Eliminating human bias from AI systems is crucial to creating a fair and inclusive society.
The risks of automated bias in AI are significant and encompass ethical concerns, social disparities, and the erosion of trust in AI systems. Human biases can infiltrate AI algorithms and training data, leading to unintended discriminatory outcomes. Examples of bias in AI include racial and gender bias, which can perpetuate inequalities, and harmful stereotypes include hiring algorithms and automated decision-making systems, which pose particular risks, as biased data can result in systematic favouritism and the perpetuation of inequalities. These biases hinder progress, undermine fairness, and raise ethical issues. To address these risks, it is crucial to promote diversity in data collection, algorithm design, and AI development teams. Transparency, accountability, and the establishment of regulatory frameworks are essential to ensure the responsible and unbiased use of AI technology. By acknowledging and mitigating bias in AI, we can strive for fair, inclusive, and trustworthy AI systems that benefit society as a whole.
References:
Bibliography/References
Zhao, Fariñas (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions. Eur Bus Org Law Rev, 1(24), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-022-00262-2
Ferrara (2023). Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (Preprint).. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.48399
Kartal (2022). A Comprehensive Study on Bias in Artificial Intelligence Systems. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, 1(18), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijiit.309582
Lee (2022). Tools adapted to Ethical Analysis of Data Bias. Hkie Transactions, 3(29), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.33430/v29n3thie-2022-0037
Sinwar (2023). Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A review. RACSC, (16). https://doi.org/10.2174/2666255816666230523114425
Viswanath, Clinch, Ceresoli, Dhesi, D’Oria, Simone, … & Damaskos (2023). Perceptions and practices surrounding the perioperative management of frail emergency surgery patients: a WSES-endorsed cross-sectional qualitative survey. World J Emerg Surg, 1(18). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00471-7
Kumar (2021). Biases in Artificial Intelligence Applications A ffecting H uman L ife : A Review. IJRTE, 1(10), 54-55. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.a5719.0510121
Aquino (2023). Practical, epistemic and normative implications of algorithmic bias in healthcare artificial intelligence: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary expert perspectives. J Med Ethics, jme-2022-108850. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108850
Geraci (2022). Introduction., 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9788194831679.003.0001
Wayne Application of Machine Learning on Fracture Interference.. https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.3698
Raveendra, Satish, Singh (2020). Changing Landscape of Recruitment Industry: A Study on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Eliminating Hiring Bias from Recruitment and Selection Process. j comput theor nanosci, 9(17), 4404-4407. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2020.9086
Weyerer, Langer (2020). Bias and Discrimination in Artificial Intelligence., 256-283. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1879-3.ch011
Gan, Moussawi (2022). A Value Sensitive Design Perspective on AI Biases.. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2022.676
Ferrara (2023). Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (Preprint).. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.48399
O’Connor (2023). Gender bias perpetuation and mitigation in AI technologies: challenges and opportunities. AI & Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01675-4
Kumar (2021). Biases in Artificial Intelligence Applications A ffecting H uman L ife : A Review. IJRTE, 1(10), 54-55. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.a5719.0510121
Sinwar (2023). Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A review. RACSC, (16). https://doi.org/10.2174/2666255816666230523114425
Lee (2022). Tools adapted to Ethical Analysis of Data Bias. Hkie Transactions, 3(29), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.33430/v29n3thie-2022-0037
Saed, Munaweera, Anderson, O’Neill, Hu (2021). Rapid statistical discrimination of fluorescence images of T cell receptors on immobilizing surfaces with different coating conditions. Sci Rep, 1(11). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94730-3
Kartal (2022). A Comprehensive Study on Bias in Artificial Intelligence Systems. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, 1(18), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijiit.309582
Zhao, Fariñas (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions. Eur Bus Org Law Rev, 1(24), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-022-00262-2
Wu, Wu, Qi, Zhang, Xie, Huang (2022). Removing AI’s sentiment manipulation of personalized news delivery. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, 1(9). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01473-1
Kharitonova, Savina, Pagnini (2021). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE’S ALGORITHMIC BIAS: ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES. Вест. ПГУ. Юр. науки, 3(53), 488-515. https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2021-53-488-515
[24] Xivuri (2023). How AI Developers Can Assure Algorithmic Fairness.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2820618/v1
(2020). Call for Papers: Human Interaction with Artificial Intelligence Systems. IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst., 6(50), 631-631. https://doi.org/10.1109/thms.2020.3035309
Ferrara (2023). Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (Preprint).. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.48399
Chan (2022). GPT-3 and InstructGPT: technological dystopianism, utopianism, and “Contextual” perspectives in AI ethics and industry. AI Ethics, 1(3), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00148-6
Yi (2022). Artificial Intelligence and the Constitution: Response from the Perspective of Constitutional Rights to the Risks of Artificial Intelligence. Korean Constitutional Law Assoc, 2(28), 347-383. https://doi.org/10.35901/kjcl.2022.28.2.347
(2022). ICRA 2022 Plenary and Keynote Speakers.. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra46639.2022.9811971
Lee (2022). Tools adapted to Ethical Analysis of Data Bias. Hkie Transactions, 3(29), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.33430/v29n3thie-2022-0037